To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I am the OP and I don’t live on “Pebble Hill”! I live below APS on the eastside. As usual confusion reigns because folks make sort of lame assumptions they run with as fact. For all who tried to answer my question I thank you.
The county is worthless. There is a motorcycle track in Santa Rita hills that is an environmental hazard and they won’t address because it was “permitted “ under false pretenses
AHCHOOO: No, the neighbors never got any satisfaction from the tour vans that were parked all over the place, but (hallelujah!), the owner has just sold his house, and the neighborhood rumor is that he’s leaving the state. We couldn’t be happier.
This is a city property, not a county property, but same procedure – city complaints are filed at the 630 Garden Street address. Pays to get to know the SB Municipal Code, especially the zoning or transportation chapters, to learn what one can and cannot do in this town. What constitutes blight in this town needs to be strengthened. Good issue for upcoming city council elections that go well beyond city employee compensation and perks matters, and instead offers actual relief for city residents. More city staff need to be cross-trained to provide zoning enforcement .More city council time needs to be devoted to the benefit of city property owners and combatting blight.
I saw that the house was on the market, and my first thought was, yay! No more multiple SUVs parked all over the block!
On the subject of parking, I wonder if it would be a good thing to have the city planners assess the parking situation in each of our neighborhoods and give them a grade. Neighborhoods like the lower westside area bounded by the 101, Carrillo/Meigs, and Cliff Drive where there is no parking available on weekday evenings would get an F. San Roque might get an A or B. Any neighborhood with a grade of D or F would not be allowed to approve additional residential projects with insufficient off-street parking. Maybe will try to make this an op-ed piece.
What I love about parking enforcement vs. building dept zoning violations: Parking enforcement refuses to reveal any info on whom it was that alerted them to any violation. Zoning, on the other hand, puts the info into a file, for one and all to access. In which case, unless you filed your complaint via your attorney, ( anonymously, i. e.,) beware of serious blowback.
Anyone can park as many trucks or cars as they want within the allowed ordinance dimensions on any Santa Barbara residential street unless there are posted restrictions. Most trucks exceed the 80” width requirement. Look up make and model dimensions on-line, file complaint. Some owners of small companies pick a nearby street to park 3-5 company trucks. Eastside around SALINAS has a few regularly parked oversized trucks. There can be no ordinance prohibiting the public from using a public street. Does anyone know why ‘resident only parling’ Is not legally challenged on public, taxpayer funded and maintained streets? After all. Public streets and walks are for every’s use. Some public Streets can be privatized to keep parking for residents only.