By Robert Bernstein
February 24 marked the one year anniversary of the start of Putin’s brutal invasion and war against the people of Ukraine. Santa Barbara had multiple events for the occasion. I briefly attended the February 25 event at the Courthouse, after my morning visit to the snow. I left when it began to rain fairly hard and I needed to get to another commitment. Here are my photos.
When I arrived, Tatyana Taruta was speaking about the situation in Ukraine.
The crowd was very attentive and concerned.
A number of elected officials were present. Notably, Congress member Adam Schiff spoke about what the US was doing to support the people of Ukraine militarily and with humanitarian supplies.
Here is my video of his complete speech.
He emphasized that the people of Ukraine are not just fighting for their freedom, but for the freedom of Europe and, ultimately, the entire world. They are paying a very high price in terms of civilians and soldiers being killed as well as the destruction of much of their housing and power systems in the middle of winter. The US and Europe are just giving them a hand.
Following his speech, Supervisor Das Williams introduced our new District Attorney John Savrnoch. Here is my video of his entire speech.
Dasha Lobko is from Ukraine and attends UC Santa Barbara. She kindly posed with the famed long-time UCSB Arts and Lectures events organizer Roman Baratiak, who is also of Ukrainian ancestry. Full disclosure, so am I. My father’s grandfather Jacob came from Ukraine to New York all alone at age 16. When I learned a year ago that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was also a Russian-speaking Jew, I realized we may even be related.
My friend Wesley Roe wanted to emphasize that peace has to be the goal for Ukraine.
Some of my other friends skipped this rally and instead held a rally at the office of Congress member Salud Carbajal emphasizing the need for negotiations and a reduction in the flow of weapons.
For my entire life I have pushed for an end to US meddling in other countries and a reduction in the military budget. But each time an intervention was on the horizon I looked at the facts on their merit.
I watched the US send troops to Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia, killing millions of innocent people. In Cambodia, the US even supported the mass murderer Pol Pot, until the Vietnamese military stopped him. How often the US seemed to be on the wrong side.
I watched the US send weapons and support to death squads in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Guatemala. The US sent military support to Indonesia as it brutally murdered hundreds of thousands of utterly innocent civilians in the nation of East Timor.
I watched the US support Muslim terrorists in Afghanistan, which not only destroyed that country, but led to the spread of Muslim terrorism, including 9/11. The US twice invaded Iraq. The result being a strengthening of the Islamist government in Iran. Not to mention that the US overthrew the democratically elected liberal government of Iran in the 1950s, installing the hated Shah. Leading to the inevitable takeover by the brutal Islamists still in power.
The list goes on in Angola and elsewhere in Africa. The pattern is so solid that one can be forgiven for just saying NO to any US intervention or supply of weapons.
But I see the case of Ukraine as more like the case of the start of World War II. After the utterly pointless loss of tens of millions in World War I, most Americans wanted nothing to do with intervention in Europe. Totally understandable, but the result was horrific.
The US did nothing as fascism rose in Spain. The US could have helped the Republican elected government of Spain hold power, but it just let Franco fight his revolution and take over. The rise of the fascists in Italy and the Nazis in Germany also brought no action from the US. It took a direct attack on the US base at Pearl Harbor for the US to take action.
In my ideal world, there would be an international government that would have the power to rein in brutal dictators. The UN was created after World War II with that intention. But it is held hostage to the Security Council, where the worst violators get to veto any action. At times, that has been the US. More often, it is China or Russia.
I watched this short but valuable debate on Democracy Now about the situation in Ukraine.
It was between CODEPINK leader Medea Benjamin and former Senator Bernie Sanders policy advisor Matt Duss. Both make important points worth listening to, in my view. Medea Benjamin makes the case for prioritizing peace and negotiation.
But, in the end, I side with the points made by Matt Duss. The only way to have meaningful negotiation is from a position of strength. If not for continued US support, Ukraine would have been overrun. The dictators of the world need to know that the world will fight back to contain them, if not defeat them. For the first time in my life, I am proud that the US is arming people who are fighting for their right to be free.
Over $100 BILLION of OUR U.S. taxpayers funds going to this war with more checks being written weekly with ZERO accountability. The U.S. refused to organize a peace negotiation to end this last year… This is a serious cluster and only getting worse. Many of these Ukrainians are culturally tied to Russia, but the Western Powers refuse to recognize this or arrange any settlement… Let’s all join hands and celebrate the coming of WWIII
So Ukraine, Europe and U.S. stand aside and let Putin take over? How expensive is tyranny and dictatorship in Europe? We fought two world wars to prevent this from happening. You can join hands with Putin, but the rest of us won’t.
Another extreme Red Creek, join hands with Putin? Why does the US need to get involved in this, Europe is perfectly capable of taking care of their continent themselves – if they were willing.
This sentiment kept the US from engaging Germany in the 30’s when they could have been stopped. People like you and VOR would have invited Adolf right in the front door. Zero understanding of world history. I could recommend some books for you gals to read.
GT – Are you using “gals” as an archaic insult?! what the heck? bad move.
VOICE – “”Require the unvaccinated to wear armbands designating they are unvaccinated – so normal, logically thinking, vaccinated people can avoid them.” – Yes, exactly. AVOID, not round up and murder by the millions. You’re disgusting to equate the two. Awful.
Any precondition to peace involves Russia withdrawing from Ukraine, which they are unwilling to do. The vast majority of US aid is equipment, not a “blank check,” and is subject to all the due diligence that other federal programs receive. I’m sorry about the 100 billion, I’m sure you and the retired reality show host would rather add to the $2 trillion in tax breaks he gave to corporations and people making over $500k. Lots of due diligence there and “fiscal conservatism” going on there! Lmao
I suppose it makes some sense to say that it’s misogynist to refer to vile despicable people using female terms.
Correct, but context was needed when GT brought “Adolf” into this. Ignoring his misogyny is on point for you as well – it’s amazing what bad behavior gets excused when it’s directed at a person, party, idea, you don’t like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL2B-AAnsHo
Rules are rules except for you though…. it’s okay when you do it… again….
This is an article about the Ukraine war, not COVID. Stop your miserable trolling. My God man, have some effing decency.
GT being misogynistic and referencing Adolf is on point. Remember, he wanted the unvaccinated to wear armbands so they can be identified: General Tree from 7/26/21: “Require the unvaccinated to wear armbands designating they are unvaccinated – so normal, logically thinking, vaccinated people can avoid them.”
Rules are rules crybaby. Stop breaking them.
VOR. I interchangeably use guys and gals or his or her. I don’t pretend to know your gender. You should study modern English and composition “brother”
Mr Bernstein, where do you think we’d be today if a 18-24 months ago the US and NATO committed to Russia that it would not allow Ukraine to join NATO, and would cease NATO’s further expansion east? (commence Putin lover comments now from the typical EdScolds but this is a serious question). I’ll watch the debate you linked later this evening.
@2:23
Gosh, you’re wrong on just about every subject you pontificate about.
There’s a good book out about people like you:
Peter Burke
Ignorance : a global history
One particular quote he cites has relevance to what you’re saying:
“A quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing.”
Neville Chamberlain, speaking about Czechoslovakia in 1938. Those of us who know history are aware of what followed.
Or, how about this one:
“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile – hoping it will eat him last.”
Winston Churchill
Wrong for asking a question… wow. What’s with these EdScold’s that don’t allow questions, just 100% unfaltering support of the current thing. Your (reads like macpuzl again) comments reek of the fascism you so often project onto others.
Maybe many of us are reacting to your parenthetical editorial comment. I know I am.
Shocking, VoR is wrong and getting downvoted into oblivion again lol
VOR, why do love to call people “EdScolds” when you literally scold people every day. The cognitive dissonance is amazing.
parenthetical editorial comment that was very accurate as shown. For some reason many here think that if you are against war you support Putin, as if it’s black and white and those are the only two options.
Ed, can you make a separate page for VOR to spew his nonsense whenever he wants and anyone who wishes to engage with him can, but only that one page? And all other pages clear from his antagonism?
Signed,
A longtime reader and fan
The CMaR Column – Starring ->…. “Starring is an adjective that’s used when someone’s at the center of things, like a concert starring a famous cellist. The Greek word aster became the English word star, which was first used to mean “to be featured in a play” in the 1820s”.
Works for me!
SBSURFERLIFE – that is a fantastic idea. I might drop by once and while to make sure he’s not lying too much, but would otherwise love to be free of his constant trolling and deflection. At least CHIP and others with whom I disagree are able to acknowledge corrections and refrain from non-stop deflection and gaslighting when called out for being wrong. I always enjoy a spirited debate/discussion/even argument, but the bang my head against the wall style back and forths are just too much. I feel bad for those who end up reading them!
SBSURFERLIFE – VOR already has his own section – you can usually find him in the deleted comments section.
GT – da dum dum clash! My verbal attempt at a comedic drum thing lol!
CW and VOR are just what Russia wants to hear from the autocracy-loving loony right wing.
Big mistake, if you know history.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/08/12/russia-ukraine-war-crimes-genocide-appeasement-mearsheimer-putin/
Why do you make such fanatical comments when people ask about peace and diplomacy? Why are you so thirsty for war? Why do you insist the US continue to be the world’s police with our horrendous track record the past 50+ years? How many millions of innocent men, women and children need to die for your blood lust to be satisfied?
VOR why do you enjoy the butchery of seeing schools and apartment buildings being obliterated with hypersonic missiles?
It’s odd that the right-wingers were rabidly anti-Russia and world police in all the wrong areas (Grenada, Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Honduras). But when a genuinely valid struggle for democracy and basic sovereignty happens for the first time since Korea, they turn into Putin simps. Oh but he hates drag queens, I guess that makes it okay to launch missiles at cities and execute civilians.
Alex who wants millions to die?
EDHAT, this shit right here–is psychotic.
You delete comments that sling vulgar names, but you don’t delete a comment saying that someone wants millions to die?
WTF?
SACJON: Alex is referring to the last sentence of a certain despicable person’s comment at 3:22pm
SNICKER – ah, got it. That’s our local troll all right.
GT only you could spin my very clear anti-war stance into me enjoying people getting killed. You are truly a disgusting human being.
VOR name calling
Name-calling as usually VOR. You support Putin but not Xi… fact. You support Putin rolling into the Baltics. Bet your kids are proud of you.
Is there a thread here where someone is making posts under my name that I can’t see, or are you just being a divisive, hateful, instigating induvial making things up again?
Sac–
Yep, “VoICe oF REaSon”
Saying that some anonymous commenter here (GT I believe) is full of bloodlust and wants millions of people to die.
So very reasonable of him.
Good write up and report on the Ukraine local matters. Part reporting and part opinion, well thought out and very relevant. I was surprised to see Sen. Schiff here in support of Ukraine in our community. This kind of local reporting is where EdHat shines, and in the absence of a local newspaper, ensures that we have some good journalism.
RED CREEK – Schiff is a well documented liar regarding major issues and has no credibility. Nothing Schiff says should be believed, especially when speaking about what our government is doing regarding Ukraine.
Doulie is a right wing ideologue with no credibility and is lying about Adam Schiff. And as a member of Congress, Adam Schiff obviously has relevant knowledge about what the U.S. is doing regarding Ukraine. Not that it’s even relevant–Red Creek simply expressed surprise about Schiff (who is not a Senator, although he’s running for that office) being present and offering his support of Ukraine. Doulie’s comment is pure trolling and the expression of a dark and dishonest heart.
Please, cite some of those “well documented” instances from other than vapid con social media sources.
7:56 @
Schiff didn’t lie in any of the instances you mentioned. Got any cites to reputable sources? No, of course not, when you’re just parroting garbage from right-wing social media.
Oh really, then where is all that proof “in plain sight” Rep. Schiff went on and on about regarding Trump colluding with the Russians? You know the “smoking gun” he claimed to have? (@1:35)
“To show I have no credibility you will need to” read Doulie’s comments, here and in the past.
Again, any trustworthy citations? Or just the usual Fox crap.
“has proven he will fabricate and twist comments to play into his agenda”
As they say, every accusation from a right winger is a confession.
“has proven he will fabricate and twist comments to play into his agenda”
As they say, every accusation from a right winger is a confession; the examples are endless:
https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1632934370829803520
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/wfjj1o/every_accusation_is_a_confession/
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/10/5/2126238/-Every-Accusation-is-a-Confession
https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1530305086068596736
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/jfaxs2/every_accusation_is_a_confession/
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/z8vx98/every_accusation_is_a_confession/
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/yhme3j/every_republicans_accusation_is_a_confession/
https://www.reddit.com/r/awfuleverything/comments/1102tm1/every_accusation_is_a_confession/
https://imgur.com/gallery/lZxfNc9
https://imgur.com/t/every%20accusation%20is%20a%20confession
I could go on all day.
@2:25 Schiff didn’t just claim that he had a smoking gun and leave it at that, he said what the smoking gun was … why don’t you tell us what that was, since you’re such a keen expert on Schiff’s statements?
We also have the GOP’s own 2016 Senate Intelligence Report on Russian interference that validated much of what Schiff had said (Schiff’s comments about a smoking gun predated the Mueller report, which also confirmed Schiff’s statements, contrary to Bill Barr’s obfuscations): https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/512613-five-takeaways-from-final-senate-intel-russia-report/
“The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released its long-awaited Russia interference report detailing significant contacts between the Trump campaign and Moscow during the 2016 election.
The fifth and final volume, just shy of 1,000 pages, lays out the counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities that were exposed through Russian contacts and a willingness by some members of the Trump campaign to accept foreign assistance.”
The claim that Schiff lied is right wing propaganda, not fact. And it has nothing to do with the validity of his comments about Ukraine–those objecting to our support of Ukraine are carrying Putin’s water. The argument that “Schiff lied, therefore we can’t listen to what he says about Ukraine” is absurd, especially coming from people who lie daily here and support Trump who lied more than 30,000 times while in office, Tucker Carlson and Fox “News” which is documented in the Dominion lawsuit as lying over and over again about “the Big Steal”, etc. at nauseam. If lying is the criterion, then right wingers have no foot to stand on.
3-9@10:33 – I’ll cite just a few instances where Schiff lied, not enough room on this cite to list all. Schiff lied stating Congress uncovered a criminal conspiracy by Trumps 2016 campaign. Schiff lied stating he had a “smoking gun” relative to the conspiracy. Schiff lied continually when reporting the Steele dossier was legitimate. Steele lied when stating Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. This is just a start. As I said not enough room to list all Schiff’s lies. Schiff was kicked off the House Intelligence Committee for these and other well documented lies. Regardless of my source(s), do you deny Schiff lied to American’s making statements I’ve cited above?
SNICKER – You have no clue what I believe simply because I point out comments made by Schiff were lies. To show I have no credibility you will need to prove my comments about Schiff are inaccurate. I look forward to your response. I don’t disagree Schiff, as a member of Congress has relevant information about Ukraine. But, it’s due to Schiff’s past lies that he has no credibility. Schiff has proven he will fabricate and twist comments to play into his agenda. For this reason I have to wonder if what he says is true, including what he states he has learned as a Congressman the rest of us are not privy to. Schiff is the poster child for what you refer to as a “dark and dishonest heart.” Schiff wasn’t in SB to support the Ukraine rally. The Ukraine rally happened at a time Schiff was in SB and he stopped to make some points.
Doulie was rebuked by facts. But that doesn’t jibe with his Newsmax “facts” so he is having a melt down.
Adam Schiff was until very recently chair of the House Intelligence Committee and has a top secret security clearance. The committee oversees the NSA, CIA, NRO, DoD, Homeland Security, State department, etc.
My guess is Schiff knows a little about “… what our government is doing regarding Ukraine” 🙂
Please do watch that Democracy Now debate at https://www.democracynow.org/2023/2/20/biden_kyiv_visit_russia_ukraine_war
This is the most thoughtful debate I have seen on how to achieve peace and justice for the people of Ukraine. The actual debate starts about two minutes into the video.
My favorite sign at the rally was “Iranians Stand With Ukrainians”. People who are oppressed and/or under attack need to feel solidarity with each other and know that in the long run justice and freedom will prevail.
RED CREEK and others thank you for the kind words of support. We are fortunate to have this forum.
Regarding Congress member Schiff, I will add that he is one of three major Democratic candidates running for the US Senate seat being vacated by Senator Feinstein. The other two candidates are Congress member Barbara Lee and Congress member Katie Porter.
Robert, the senate race is a whole ‘nother can of worms! I don’t like to see those 3 running against each other; it will be a difficult decision.
Thanks for your usual “man about town” photos/videos Robert. My rainy-day homework assignment was to watch the video you cited. I’ve listened to Amy Goodman on the radio but not watched via podcast.
IMO, Matt Duss had a much more realistic assessment than Medea Benjamin. To consider Putin, Xi Jinping, and Erdogan rational players in this war who can help negotiate a just peace is wishful thinking and naive.
If Russia had ruthlessly invaded the U.S. for no good reason and murdered countless civilians, I wonder if Benjamin would be thinking the same way. But since Russia invaded Ukraine and not the US, I think she needs to realize sometimes the world gets really nasty and pacifism only allows the aggressor a victory and comfort for those on the sidelines like Benjamin.
Disclaimer – Ukraine is a complicated situation for those not in Ukraine (and for those in Ukraine, it is a matter of survival and protecting their country). There are so many considerations to superimpose it’s not possible to succinctly summarize here. But I do agree with the last paragraph of your post.
It is terrible what is happening to the Ukrainian people. But a lot of people read further into this, and the extent of the US Government’s involvement of into escalating this situation. The military industrial complex is still very strong. Not a lot of calls for peace or compromise. Going head to head with Russia and now China has and will continue to lead to a lot of suffering, and possibly a larger scale conflict. Think deeper on the issue and if you or your kids had to be drafted to go into a larger war one day. War is not good for anyone. Would like to have seen more calls and strategic positioning for peace. Not what has happened today, which is the worst case scenario.
Liberty, yeah, give the bad man what he wants and he will stop.
That always works out great.
It makes sense tho fight to the death against those who will only enslave you. There have been plenty of calls for peace. Ruzzia responds but targeting civilians, trafficking children, and ignoring the Geneva convention. They don’t need to be enabled. They are a failed and vicious state.
Far right repuglicans support Putin because he is an authoritarian white Christian nationalist. Far right repuglicans do not support Xi and the People’s Republic because….
Funny, there was nary a word or objection, rather support for those who compared mask mandates to 1930s Germany over the last few years. I would have thought you would be as outraged as I was. Nope, nothing but argument when I condemned those who made the simple minded comparison.
I’m an astronaut.
Oops, “your” not “our.”
That kool-aid must be good GT. “Everything I don’t like is far-right-extremist-bigotted-MAGA -loving-Putin-supporter”
Vor who defends Putin but not Xi…. you proved my point Christian soldier.
I’m Jewish
Slava Ukraine.
Normally, YouTube is a source of loathsome garbage that people like VOR and CW feed on.
Here, however, is a PBS Frontline interview which contains some prescient insights into the whole issue with regards to the actions of Putin and his fascist, imperialist vision of Greater Russia:
https://youtu.be/um-SEQDQidM
The 9:02pm claim was about Youtube, saying that “normally” it is a source of bad stuff, which is a mischaracterization. The 10:31pm claim is about people and their reaction to the content of what bad stuff there is. These are wildly different claims, about very different things–the 10:31pm claim is true, but not the 9:02pm claim. My comment stands.
Youtube has a wide variety of content. I watch chess, science, math, philosophy, product review, bike repair, music, standup comedy, and cooking videos, among other things. Of course there’s also vile stuff, but characterizing Youtube that way is sort of like categorizing lightwaves that way.
Yet all too many people have no critical thinking skills, and believe what they see in the vile stuff, having no idea about how to determine sources that are credible.
Most of the cites of YouTube on Edhat are of the vile variety, so my comment stands, too.
11:02pm Possibly, but your 9:02 comment was about Youtube, not cites of Youtube on Edhat. Perhaps you meant to reference the latter, but you didn’t … the 9:02pm statement as written is false. End of story, over and out, not worth further debate.
Just because there are occasional useful and informative YouTube submissions does not negate the fact that YouTube is primarily a cesspool.
It’s a fact that Youtube is not “primarily” a cesspool–that assertion is ignorant and dishonest.
Perhaps the problem is what 1:41pm chooses to watch on Youtube and what its algorithm therefore presents to them. My subscriptions are such things as
https://www.youtube.com/@squareonechess6939
https://www.youtube.com/@emmymade
https://www.youtube.com/@julienolke
https://www.youtube.com/@DimashQudaibergen_official
https://www.youtube.com/@CamNicholls
https://www.youtube.com/@WilliamHaynesTV
https://www.youtube.com/@SOFIASOFIA9379
https://www.youtube.com/@SailriteDIY
https://www.youtube.com/@sbspock
https://www.youtube.com/@KaleidoscopeRMX
https://www.youtube.com/@3blue1brown
https://www.youtube.com/@AntiCitizenX
https://www.youtube.com/@IvanLives
https://www.youtube.com/@PhilipGreenShow
https://www.youtube.com/@mn8joy
https://www.youtube.com/@gadgetmatch
etc.
If you choose to live in a cesspool, that’s on you.
And just what fraction of YouTube is that?
Yes, you can tailor (to some extent) what gets suggested to you by YouTube. However, that doesn’t change the fact that the bulk of the content that exists is dreck, and it is the fodder of idiots and extremists.
MAR 09, 2023 09:02 PM – The video/interview you cite was part of PBS Frontline’s episode “Putin and the Presidents” which I found really informative. For those interested, that episode and all the full-length interviews excerpted in the production can be found on YouTube and on the PBS site:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/putin-and-the-presidents/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview-collection/putin-and-the-presidents/
I thought an interview providing good insight into the way Putin is likely thinking was the one with Russia expert Julia Ioffe (she is no armchair analyst, blunt yet thoughtful, speaks Russian, and has lived in and reported from Russia):
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview-collection/putin-and-the-presidents/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEu0oRajJxE
p.s. Youtube is actually a great source of information/entertainment once you figure out the key is to subscribe to channels you like/trust and to use the like/dislike buttons. This steers the algorithm. If one watches quality, you’ll get quality suggestions. If trash, well then …
I should add … YouTube isn’t a great experience without a subscription ($11.99) to avoid ads. Some channels we like watching for Ukraine info include BBC, Sky News, Deutsche Welle, France24, Radio Free Europe. DW has been great to understand Germany’s seeming reluctance to pour on the aide.
The helmet-cam & drone footage plus satellite images uploaded to YouTube have made Russia’s invasion the first major war to be so well documented by participants. And the various “Russian on the Street” channels like 1420 have also been interesting to see their perceptions on the “Special Operation”, sanctions, loss of McDonalds/Starbucks, mobilization, “the collective west”, etc.
Aside from Ukraine, tons of videos including live concerts (Tears for Fears at the County Bowl!), history, geography, politics, astronomy, cooking, sports, home & auto repair, personal finance, etc. You name it, it’s on YouTube. One of our favorites is the Ted-Ed videos – all kinds of knowledge in bite-sized chunks. Example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsj-hDW9bS8
“YouTube isn’t a great experience without a subscription ($11.99) to avoid ads.”
I mostly watch Youtube on the Vivaldi browser with ad blocking enabled. There are also other options: https://www.online-tech-tips.com/computer-tips/5-ways-to-watch-youtube-without-ads/
“that doesn’t change the fact that the bulk of the content that exists is dreck”
Repeating this silly claim doesn’t make it a fact. Eastbeach nails it at 1:37 … again, it’s your choice whether you seek out and watch the dreck or you watch good content, of which there is more than enough for a lifetime’s supply. So hey, you be you. My last comment on this subject.
Putin’s stated aim is to rebuild the Soviet Union. If he is successful in Ukraine his next targets will likely be the Baltics, NATO countries all. The US will then send troops to fight directly against the Soviet Union, a scary prospect.
Avoiding this scenario is why we are spending billions to arm Ukraine.
As a humanitarian working in Afghanistan, I sincerely hope that our country will support Ukraine until the demands of Ukraine are met and the invaders have been pushed completely out of the country, restoring all of their damage and creating a political initiative within Russia for administration change.
Slava Ukraini.
GT and Sac, reading through these threads you should be ashamed. A bunch of name calling, is that your version of input and debate? Hashtag, especially bitter!
The people they are responding to have no idea what a discussion or debate is.
This from the guy who took to task Jerry Roberts, who had cancer twice and a splenectomy and is immunocompromised, for wearing a mask–Basic ass-sumed that Jerry was alone, which he wasn’t. That is the only thing worth knowing about Basic, and the only response worth making to him, ever.
Name calling? Awwwww. But also, where? Where here did I call anyone anything other than saying VOICE is disgusting for comparing covid rules and what a few people on a comment board said to what actually happened to “his” ancestors 90 years ago in Europe. Oh…. and calling bigots, “bigots.”
Listen, man. Sometimes, the insults (SBLOCAL), lies (VOICE), ableism (SBSTONER), abject hatred (COASTWATCH), homophobia (KKSYV, VOICE, SBSTONER, et al), get to be too much. Sorry if I made any rude comments that hurt your feelings, but a man can take only so much.
And please, spare us the feigned concern. You said people who were upset about the banning of Pride flags were “butt hurt” and should “STFU” so give it a rest about the “name calling.” Seriously man, seriously?
“bitter” is name calling.
Pretty rich having any conservative tell people they should be ashamed. 7 years and counting of dumpster juice trying to pass itself off as politics.
Slava Ukraine. We should have helped them shut down the airspace of Ukraine a long time ago. Biden was slow to act on Ukraine and now some on the far right and far left are starting to more loudly question our support of Ukraine. Putin must be stopped in Ukraine and Moldova. That must include any/all missile and air defense systems.
DUKEMUNSON? Good to see you back!
surfacing to chime in here. I see a lot of really messed up comment, of course by the usual suspects (VOR). I will simply say this. I have been there twice and defended as a volunteer. I’ve trained people, dogs, myself. I’ve participated in combat missions (with no prior experience), i’ve saved people, i’ve not saved people (think about it….), i’ve been shot at and shot back. I’ve seen ukrainian friends obliterated by russians. i’ve seen dead kids and women. i saw terrible, awful things committed by the orcs. None of you know how it is until you are there and see the suffering, the conditions, the fear and paranoia, the heartache, the pain, the misery and sorrow. Have you? IDGAF what VOR or some of you think about the war and Putin. He’s a murderous thug, nothing less. There is no justification for what he’s done. This is a land grab under the guise of fear of NATO expansion. Nato isn’t going to expand into Russia, nor are they going to ignore applications of Russias neighbors to join when Russia is back to their usual game of killing and land grabs. This started in the 90s with Chechnya, then Georgia and South Ossentia, now 2014 and Ukraine, now 2023 and Ukraine, but we’re supposed to stand by and allow Russia to invade and capture a huge European nation? I think not and if you think so, you’re on the wrong side, flat out.
https://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/obama-offers-praise-of-putin-120127
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/03/23/trumps-not-only-u-s-president-congratulate-putin-election-win-obama-did-2012/452901002/
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/24/putin-was-playing-biden-all-along-00011555
It is not messed up to critcize how our own foreign policies over the past decade have only embolden murderous thugs like Putin rather than discouraged, it’s not messed up to have an anti-war position, it’s not messed up to express caution (unlike Iraq and the WMD’s) as we continue to escalate this foreign conflict closer to WWIII, and its certainly possible to hold these positions while also being opposed to Putin’s actions.
Glad you acknowledge the 4 years of that “last decade” where we basically made “friends” with “murderous thugs” and dictators, writing them love letters and what not.
Can you explain exactly what policies “emboldened” Putin?
https://www.businessinsider.com/revealed-donald-trump-letters-to-vladimir-putin-miss-universe-russia-2020-8
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2020/08/18/trump-wrote-putin-to-congratulate-him-on-being-named-time-person-of-the-year/?sh=33730ca06485
ive been there twice and volunteered as a defender, aligned with the Georgian National Legion in Ukraine. Returning soon for a third…