By an edhat reader
A video went viral showing a local woman making racist comments towards a construction worker, prompting a protest outside a downtown Santa Barbara apartment complex.
On Sunday around 8:00 p.m., a large group of people gathered outside the corner of E. Micheltorena and Garden Streets showing solidarity for the construction worker.
Over the weekend, a video was posted online showing an older white woman confonting a man working on a nearby property. The video, which has since been taken down but was seen by edhat staff, shows the woman getting confrontational with the man as he films their converstion.
She stated she’s a neighbor and has every right to know what’s happening at the nearby property. The conversation escalates as the woman states she’s an American followed by a racist comment about the worker’s ethnicity.
The video ends as the woman apparently hits the man or the camera out of the man’s hand.
KEYT reports the protestors were there to hold the woman accountable for her racist statement and actions.
The woman reportedly left the building during the protest and went to the police station.
During the gathering, the group walked to the front of the Santa Barbara Police Department and continued to express outrage over the video. After a short while, the group returned to the area of Garden and East Micheltorena Street and dispersed.
The Santa Barbara Police Department issued a statement before noon on Monday clarifying something said in the video.
“In the video, a woman stated, ‘I work for the police.’ The woman has no affiliation with the Santa Barbara Police Department and the police department does not condone her behavior,” the department stated.
The police department acknowledged the “troubling” video stirred emotions and reactions within the community.
“The Santa Barbara Police Department monitored the gathering and supports the right for all individuals to peacefully assemble in order to voice their concerns,” the department stated.
Videos of the interaction posted by @enamoradoalex are provided below:
[Ed Note: This article has been updated with information provided by the Santa Barbara Police Department and videos of the incident]
No, I truly am curious. I remember an instance in the harbor several years ago when a local boat owner, in his slip, flew the Mexican flag on the boat’s flagpole and the Harbormaster had him remove it. Maybe it’s different for boats? Maritime law or something? Either way, I understand the protesters need to support what the obviously believed was one of their own! Too bad the incident happened at all.
Hammonds, are you serious? The harbormaster had someone remove a flag from their boat? That is one hundred percent not a legal requirement or request, I am really skeptical that this could have happened. If it did, the harbormaster would be one hundred percent in the wrong. There is no legal requirement that one fly any flag on their boat, at their house, car, or anywhere else in this country, just as there is no law barring the flying of any flag.
His YouTube information shows that he is an activist: ..” He is now an Activist and City Commissioner in the South East Los Angeles. His work began in 2009 when he and the community got together to disband the corrupt police department of Cudahy and Maywood that was removed completely in July 2010. His work entails of a 5 year experience as the National Lead Field Organizer for the Willie Velasquez Institute. He later went on to work for Senator Bernie Sanders as a Regional Field Director overseeing the Central Coast Of the State of California.”
I find it an interesting moment in time for these 2 people to have met in this house under construction. She’s a former UC law professor and he works for human rights. If they had met each other , as equals, in Senator Bernie Sanders’ office, their interactions would have been SO different!
I see a “Sliding Doors” sort of movie idea here: The first meeting in the house under construction and the 2nd meeting in a politician’s office.
The construction worker is an activist who worked for Senator Bernie Sanders.
“Sliding Doors” is a movie with G Paltrow playing 2 alternate versions of her life in London.
Had the UC professor lady and the construction worker/activist met under different circumstances, she would not have shouted at him and physically assaulted him.
CLOUD – who are you talking about?
*”As equals* meant in her eyes.
Oh, interesting!
CLOUD – sorry to nitpick, but he’s not. Edin was not the guy taking the video, it was a man named, Luis. There’s an edited video on Instagram. The worker sent this video to Edin, who then organized the protest.
Also, the woman’s name is Jeanne Umana.
Oh, how disappointing. I WANTED the construction worker to be an activist!
Yes, Edin E. is the same construction worker who is also an activist.
J. Umana taught law and society at UCSB
CLOUD – is the worker you’re thinking of or the person, Edin Enamorado, who posted the video?
Yes, that would be pretty interesting!
Edin Enamorado
https://www.youtube.com/c/edinalexenamorado/about
Edin Alex Enamorado grew up in Cudahy, CA. After the birth of his first son he decided to change his life around after being a Convicted Felon. He is now an Activist and City Commissioner in the South East Los Angeles. His work began in 2009 when he and the community got together to disband the corrupt police department of Cudahy and Maywood that was removed completely in July 2010. His work entails of a 5 year experience as the National Lead Field Organizer for the Willie Velasquez Institute. He later went on to work for Senator Bernie Sanders as a Regional Field Director overseeing the Central Coast Of the State of California.
https://www.foxla.com/news/activist-wants-to-protect-la-street-vendors-from-rising-crime
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/edin-enamorado-who-would-take-a-bullet-for-street-food-vendors-is-the-hero-we-all-need/ar-AA18ildY
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/los-angeles-street-vendors-attacks-protection-crime-cudahy/2561841/
Cloud, why would you “want the construction worker to be an activist.”?
Can’t explain why I wanted the man who was verbally and physically assaulted to turn out to be the organizer of the protest and an activist .
Glad to hear the SBPD’s support of this and that she did not, despite her cowardly lie, work for our PD.
Thank you, Edhat, for helping out this rotten person. People like this in our community should not be tolerated.
I don’t condone what she said but my question is this – she bullied/attempted to intimidate the worker, why is a 50+ person protest in front of her home not also considered bullying/intimidation? Because it was peaceful? What about all the car engines revving, tires squealing and fireworks? Is that peaceful and not intimidating? At first I thought it was a car rally until I heard the bullhorn and chanting.
Bullying/intimidating racists is OK. It’s not a different point of view we’re dealing with, they should be intimidated until they learn to either educate themselves or keep their hate in their heads and out of our community.
Why is it white people are always looking for excuses for other white people’s bad behavior?
4:48, personally, I don’t think that it is okay. I understand why they did it but I don’t know that it helps the situation at all.
I think that a couple of people inviting her to have a calm and polite discussion about why what she did was wrong might have been a better approach. But, here’s the thing, people like her have been shitting on people like for a loooooong time. And, historically, when that guy’s community would dare to speak out, they’d get police dogs, batons and tear gas. The fact that they refused to stop speaking out is why we don’t have that happening very much any more and decent people can go about their day with less likelihood of being attacked and shit on for their ethnicity.
@4:53 Bullying/intimidating is NEVER OK. Many have forgotten that two wrongs don’t make a right. Be the better person.
5:06, why’s it that people who use the term “white people always” are so racist?
Alex, seems like you’re triggered by the majority of racists being white people. Stating that as a fact doesn’t make someone racist.
11:53
Seems like you’re triggered by being held to the same standard as anyone else.
Racism is bad. If you use the term “white people always” then you are literally saying every single white person every single time. That is literal racism, i.e., the assumption and belief that an individual’s actions will always be predictable and predetermined by their ethnicity.
If you excuse racism that comes in one package and condemn racism that comes in another package then guess what–you racist AF.
Beyond that, you claim that “the majority of racists are white people”. LOL. Bring the proof or be quiet. You ever been to Asia? You ever been to China? There are more Chinese people than white people on the entire planet, and Chinese culture is racist AF.
So, yeah, keep on trying to justify your own racism.
Kid? Oh, not that “factual statement?” Come on, you said you would…..
LOL, Kid5.
Also, LOL, Basic, I saw your deleted comment–I knew that would bring you out. You love interacting with me, obviously, you do it more than anyone on Edhat.
Why would you do something that you don’t enjoy?
Oh, I know why. LOL.
Ed added the links to the videos of the woman.
Thanks, Ed!
Still waiting for the other old white people to jump in and say “leave the woman alone, she’s elderly and this could really affect her.”
5:43–
Hasn’t happened yet. Maybe your racist and ageist bullshit assumptions about “older white people” are just you chilling on the other side of the coin from that racist lady.
Thank you Alex.
SHOCKED that people are still trying to defend this woman and feel sorry for her after the videos clearly show that she was trespassing, falsely impersonated a police officer, assaulted someone, and made a racist comment.
Stop with the “I don’t condone her actions but…” statements. You’re excusing her bad behavior by changing the topic because she’s white. If this was a person of color doing everything she did, your statements would be 100% different.
I’m not making excuses for her – what about the rest of the neighborhood that had to put up with this “peaceful” demonstration? Wouldn’t you be intimidated with car engines revving outside your home when you had nothing to do with the situation?
And don’t presume to know what my statement would be if the roles were reversed
I would wonder why there was a lot of noise outside and what was going on. I might even step outside and ask someone. When I woke up and read the story to learn about why they were protesting, I’d fully support the movement and maybe comment on Edhat about how I support it. I certainly would not comment and detract from the main issue to complain about the noise. Because the noise isn’t the issue to this whole thing… see?
My question stands, what will the town do with the knowledge gained?
If the goal is to ostracize her, has the goal been accomplished? Do all the protestors go home now?
You mention consequences, what are the consequences. Being ostracized? Or are there additional consequences?
And nowhere did I complain about the protest.
OK, so now that the whole town knows of this violent racist old women, what does the town do with the knowledge the town has gained?
GER8T – Now the town knows to ostracize her. Now other racists in our town know that this kind of cowardly bs will not be tolerated. Now she knows she can’t spew racism without consequences.
Are you really, honestly concerned about what this protest has accomplished or just trying to complain about a protest? Seems it did exactly as intended: shamed a racist and brought the issue up for discussion in our community. Total success.
GER8T – I’ve answered your question and you clearly don’t like it. Yes, the protestors went home. Read the article. Consequences are that this racist was outed and shamed. Additional consequences my occur should she apply for a job somewhere, I don’t know and that’s not the point. The point is the protest seems to have served its purposes – bringing to light the racism that exists even in our paradise and shaming a woman for being racist and abusive.
You did not answer the question previously but you did now.
Great, I am happy that the protest ” seems to have served its purpose.”
“KEYT reports the protestors were there to hold the woman accountable for her racist statement and actions. ”
What actions will the protestors take to hold her accountable? What will be considered a successful protest?
GER8T – This. This is considered successful because, thanks to this protest gaining news attention, the whole town knows of this violent racist old woman. Good job!
That’s one nasty old woman. No doubt about it. Racist? Yeah. Entitled? Yep.
Tensions are high. Breaking the law requires accountability and transparency.
Huh? That made no sense at all.
SBWOMAN – what law are you talking about?
She seems horrible. Probably not guilty of breaking and entering (don’t you have to jimmy a lock or something for the “breaking” part?) but maybe trespassing. And racism or bigotry or both.
I don’t know if the loud protest was the best way to address this, but it did draw attention to it, and I assume that was the point.
No breaking or entering, but definitely trespassing. Impersonating a police officer. And assault. Funny she was a law professor.
What has been left out is that the protesters then walked 2 blocks up Garden Street to Valerio at 9:30pm still chanting and making noise. They were on the sidewalks and in the street. Though peaceable, it was disconcerting at that time of night. Yes, I live on Garden just down from Valerio.
Not clear what the value is of showing the apartment building? It seems likely that someone offended by the bad behavior of the woman mentioned might go there and do damage or even mistakenly harass or attack another resident. We don’t need to escalate these bad behaviors and encourage others to do the same.
Yeah, the building and others living there are not the guilty parties. We all have idiot racists living around us.
Good. Racists and bigots who feel emboldened to spout off like this should be publicly shamed. There’s no “right” way to disparage someone based on the attributes they’re born with.
Cool, our local bigots have spoken.
So SACJON- Anyone who has an opinion or disagreement with some other viewpoint that differs from you, your “group” or “identity’s ” must be publicly shamed and outed…
You are going down the WRONG PATH here…
I don’t condone bad behavior, but this is no different. This shit has to STOP.
OG – or better yet, show who is up/down voting. I’d love to know which cowards are on here today downvoting every comment that condemns racism.
COAST – being racist isn’t an opinion. And yes, bigots and racists have no place in our society and they should be shamed as an example to others. Why are you defending them?
COAT–
That lady was out in public being a racist POS.
Accountability is a funny thing–when people know that their behavior may be captured and broadcast for everyone to see they are probably going to be less likely to engage in it. That’s one of the benefits of living a small town actually, people are more polite, because when they are dicks everyone will know about it.
Think and feel what you want, but don’t attack other people with racist BS
Eh, people would just act the way they do in person. I’d have to be my normal public self, polite, kind, never being a sarcastic and trolling meanie who schools mouth breathers and lazy thinkers.
Edhat is awesome for me, I get to work out all of my irritations on people who enjoy interacting with me. Cheapest therapy around.
Al @11:11- Right!? Can you imagine if everyone here had to reveal their name and picture? ED would be no more…
You have a good one as well.
I saw the video. I’d like to know more about the situation that brought this about as the TikTok video was missing everything relevant and just had some guy in broken English telling a neighbor that she was on private property as she was inquiring the nature of the construction job. The edit seemed a bit odd.
What was missing was what kind of work was going on and when and by whom and what brought the situation to that point. Not condoning her behavior in anyway, she obviously lost her senses, but we do have a two tiered system here and commercial construction on a Sunday is not allowed in the city. Was this a permitted build and being worked on by licensed and insured contractors? Or was this another illegal construction job by someone paying someone cash and avoiding the pesky rules that are only for the suckers. I for one am pretty tired of the fact that there are two systems in play in SB. So many people break the law while wanting the law to protect them.
Again. Not condoning this in anyway but I’d like to know the full story. And why are these people waiving Mexican flags, chanting Viva La Raza while calling others racists? The whole thing stinks.
Thank you very much, 11:21.
There is a shot of her on the KEYT report here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2v3og5INPg
She’s very lucky. Most of these videos go national.
STEW – why would waving Mexican flags and chanting “long live the people” be objectionable or hypocritical? They’re showing unity.
La Raza literally means The Race. That’s why. Not to mention Mexican’s are not a race, they are a nationality and a mix of European and Indio lineages. Mexico is also polarized between these two factions. Polarization that you’d call racist based on your definition. Waiving a Mexican flag on American soil while wanting American laws to protect you is allowed in America and protected by the 1st amendment. I support that right whole heartily, but it doesnt mean it’s appropriate or decent. In this case the irony of a group chanting “long live the race” while calling for the head of a “Gringo” who said to someone “you are Tijauna’n” seems lost on you.
Maybe focus on the rest of what I wrote and ask yourself what we have a two tiered system that allows one group to break the law while requiring another to pay for and adhere to every rule. Is this situation racist if it’s divided by nationality or is it economic or is it something else? I dont know. You tell me. Frankly I dont care what color or nationality or religion or creed or sexuality a person is, but I do find cheating and being a scofflaw morally offensive.
Again. I do not condone the actions of this woman that is shown on the video, but I dont know what was actually playing out here nor what this guy said to her that isn’t on the video. Neither you or this mob knows. It’s the very definition of a mob mentality and is a literal witch hunt.
For reference, here’s what I saw on the video. A Latino contractor working on a home. An elderly white woman demanding that she knows who he is and what he’s doing. The contractor says she’s on private property and must leave. She says she’s a neighbor and has every right to know what’s going on. He says she doesn’t have the right to be on private property. She then says something random about being against crime and states “I’m an American, and you’re a Tijuanaian” and something else racist that I can’t recall. The contractor says that’s a racist thing to say. The woman takes a step forward then turns around and either hits the man or hits the phone out of his hand. The video ends.
So you saw what wasn’t on the video? No. You only saw what he wanted to show. Did he call her names prior and not show that part? I dont know and neither do you.
I am not white. So your assumptions are showing your true colors. Isn’t that ironic.
This isn’t worth my time. I said my peace. Your post exhibits the very problem I am trying to showcase better than I ever could.
“Waiving a Mexican flag on American soil while wanting American laws to protect you” ….”but it doesnt mean it’s appropriate or decent. ” – You object to people waving the flag of another country while wanting our laws to protect them. You think “Viva la Raza” is racist. You can “justify” all you want, but like this old woman’s comments, you are on the wrong side of humanity on this one.
I also saw the video and am baffled by your “assessment” of it. What does it matter if the work was permitted or not. Did this woman work for the city? Is she a fire inspector? No! She’s a nosy neighbor who was rude and intrusive to a guy just trying to do his job. And when he didn’t comply by answering all her questions (because he doesn’t have to) she made a racist comment and then assaulted him. How you can somehow make this into 3 different issues and ignore the main one is baffling. But, sounds about white.
Stew–
The issues of permitting are entirely irrelevant. Find a thread that talks about that.
The people out there are standing up and making it known that there is nothing wrong with their national and ethnic origin and that they will speak out when attacked on that basis.
It’s called freedom.
Also, Stew, how is his communicating in “broken English” an issue for you.
Stew, again, your totally valid concerns about people obeying or not obeying the law when doing construction work are absolutely irrelevant to this.
Beyond that, your whole screed is so off topic and wrong it’s laughable.
Here, educate yourself:
Many people incorrectly translate our name, “La Raza,” as “the race.” While it is true that one meaning of “raza” in Spanish is indeed “race,” in Spanish, as in English and any other language, words can and do have multiple meanings. As noted in several online dictionaries, “La Raza” means “the people” or “the community.” Translating our name as “the race” is not only inaccurate, it is factually incorrect. “Hispanic” is an ethnicity, not a race. As anyone who has ever met a Dominican American, Mexican American, or Spanish American can attest, Hispanics can be and are members of any and all races.
The term “La Raza” has its origins in early 20th century Latin American literature and translates into English most closely as “the people” or, according to some scholars, as “the Hispanic people of the New World.” The term was coined by Mexican scholar José Vasconcelos to reflect the fact that the people of Latin America are a mixture of many of the world’s races, cultures, and religions. Mistranslating “La Raza” to mean “the race” implies that it is a term meant to exclude others. In fact, the full term coined by Vasconcelos, “La Raza Cósmica,” meaning the “cosmic people,” was developed to reflect not purity but the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny.
This whole topic is irrelevant. But, your literal translations and you not being Hispanic show that you have no understanding of these phrases. La Raza has numerous meanings: the people, the community. It’s a chant to make all Latinos, Hispanics, Mexicans, South Americans, etc. feel united.
AND, you are assuming this Hispanic man is breaking the law by doing unpermitted work. That is racist.
Protests and rallies are not mob mentality witch hunts. It’s a group of people standing up for what they believe is right. That is their first amendment right. I’m sure you wouldn’t say the auto workers on strike are conducting a witch hunt on the car companies.
Okay thanks for that. But why would that justify waiving a Mexican flag in another country other than Mexico?
Hammonds–because the person attacked someone on the basis of their perceived nationality. It’s likely that if the lady had attacked the guy for working on a Sunday or potentially working without a permit and she had not brought issues of nationalism “I’m an American and you’re a Tijuajanan” there would have been no community response on that basis.
So when someone, for example, attacks someone for being gay, then you would expect people in the gay community to show up and wave a rainbow flag to show support for that person and others in that community who are being attacked. Make sense?
Now I have a question for you–is this a real question or are you trolling to try and perpetuate anti-Mexican sentiment?
The answer requires minimal critical thinking. It’s a shame you can’t get there.
Why would the protesters waive Mexican flags when in the United States? I really am perplexed by this. I’ve spent much time in different parts of Mexico over the years and never did I see protesters waiving American flags in Mexico. What am I missing?
Hammonds, probably because you don’t see poor American immigrant populations in Mexico being racially abused by asshole racists. If you did, I guarantee you’d see lots of American flags being waved and marches happening.
Wow, what a nasty, ugly, angry person; she needs to get help! I would personally like to teach her some manners – alas, you can’t teach an OLD dog new tricks!
So it looks like the following:
Racist LA guy bullies racist SB woman after she bullies construction worker.
BUMBLE – how is he racist? And please, enough with the “bullies racist person” BS. Poor little racists…..
BUMBLE – I never said it wasn’t bullying. Stop making things up and defending racists.
Have you actually ever listened to the guy speak?
Sorry, you’re right. Whipping up a lynch mob and marching on the person’s abode isn’t bullying. My bad.
BUMBLE – what did I make up?
You are sounding like bully now. Please stop making things up, it’s not attractive or socially appropriate.
OG – The activist is a different guy from the guy who filmed the racist attack. And yes, over a racial slur, whether it’s widespread term or not, it was directed at a person in order to disparage them for how they were born. She’s not “crazy,” she’s a racist. Let’s not make excuses that are irrelevant to what she did.
OG, dude, he wasn’t there, he didn’t film it, he reposted or posted it. It’s not a set up or a conspiracy by Antifa man, it’s just a mean racist shitting on a guy trying to make a living–you know, like the guys you work with and employ day in and day out.
Bumble is an old white guy who has never experienced racism, he doesn’t get it and refuses to get it.
The whole story will eventually come out. Like was this guy consistenly a problem? Noise? After hours construction? Blocking parking? What else? Probably at her wits end. Maybe not the best way to react but I’ll wait for the entire story before passing any judgment if at all.
ANDREA – all that is irrelevant. She went into private property, spewed racist trash at this guy, who was doing his job (whether you like the sound or not), and then hit him. None of that is excused, unless you’re a racist.
Andrea, if your go to when you are frustrated is racism, then you are an asshole who needs to do some serious self reflecting. No two ways about it.
“acting indignant when the video starts. ” – How, exactly, was he “indignant?” Because he was questioning a trespasser? If she were a young black man, you’d have scolded and blamed him for being shot on sight.
Wow Sac – I feel my argument is totally destroyed.
Hats off to you my friend. How long did it take you to type that up?
SBSTONER – seriously?
“The camera bop is unacceptable but the camera is not an extension of his person, unless you’re one of those “the letter of the law says” people.” – basic Torts 101. This is civil battery, in addition to possibly assault.
“Perhaps he was acting indignant and rude? – So what? That’s an excuse to be racist and smack him or his camera? Further, did you watch the video? At what point in their interaction, was he rude? Why did she never say he was rude?
“Perhaps where he comes from they don’t have noise laws, construction regulations, whatever to the spec we do.” – Again, so what? Stop making excuses. Further, how do you know he “comes from” somewhere else?
“If I didn’t miss anything “Tiajuanan” is not a racial slur nor is it racist to label someone by birthplace or country of origin.” – Where does he tell her (or you) his “birthplace or country of origin?”
“Just because he pulled out a camera and caught her stating a fact (she is American and he is not) doesn’t make it de facto racism.” – How do you know he’s not?
” I’d be interested to hear her side without the hub bub “she is a racist” spin from the interviewer.” – Then read the LA Times article linked above for yourself. She clearly takes responsibility for her actions.
Dude, you’ve clearly put a lot of time and effort into proving 1) you don’t know squat about the law, 2) you have no problem generalizing people based on their skin color and voice and 3) you prefer to defend racists over those who are simply working and taking video of their attacker. I’d say “do better,” but it’s clear you can’t.
Not too long at all. Simple copy/paste and state the painfully obvious.
Major stretch to say she hit him. The camera bop is unacceptable but the camera is not an extension of his person, unless you’re one of those “the letter of the law says” people.
Perhaps he was acting indignant and rude? Perhaps where he comes from they don’t have noise laws, construction regulations, whatever to the spec we do.
There was no breaking and entering as others have claimed. I suggest you google that if curious what that entails. And she stated her intentions clearly, looking for management and he was already acting indignant when the video starts. We don’t even know if it’s the whole clip or what goading could have happened from either side.
If I didn’t miss anything “Tiajuanan” is not a racial slur nor is it racist to label someone by birthplace or country of origin.
Just because he pulled out a camera and caught her stating a fact (she is American and he is not) doesn’t make it de facto racism.
We don’t know the whole story and people are dragging it way out of proportion. I’d be interested to hear her side without the hub bub “she is a racist” spin from the interviewer.
Is the construction on an Ed St. George project? I thought I heard his name mentioned in one of the videos. He didn’t have a good week what with a fire at one of his ‘student’ housing projects and now this.
“”Enamorado tells her “Let me educate you since you are a professor. This is our land. Your ancestors came from Europe. So how about you go back to Europe?” …”
Oh really…? BRING IT!
Look at COAST here, wanting to fight or whatever tough racist guy thing he is doing. Dude, you can find him. Man up and reach out to him. I’m sure he’d love to discuss this further with you.
According to Maritime Law, no flag of any other country shall be hoisted in lieu of the country in which the boat is sailed or moored. A flag of another country may be flown, but only under the flag of the United States when the boat is in fact in the United States.
Hammonds, no, that is when you are at sea, not when you are in a slip in a harbor, and typically when you are sailing in foreign waters.
If there were a legal requirement that private vessels fly the American flag then the harbormaster would be running around taking down funny pirate flags, martini flags, burgees specific to builders, and forcing the 98% of vessels that don’t actively fly an America flag to do so.
It’s just not the case.
Pick one or add your own:
Construction Karen
Professor Slappy
Grabby Gaucho
BETTY – no need to apologize 🙂
I have one thing to consider-is it possible this woman has dementia, or Alzheimer’s? I ask because my mother had a number of bizarre episodes, one where she yelled at a garden worker at the facility where she lived telling him that she owned it and to stop using a blower. She was suffering from Alzheimer’s and this was part of her odd behavior. She raised my siblings and I to respect all people but some very uncharacteristic (racist) statements came out of her mouth during her slow decline. Just a thought.
BETTY – from her apologies and explanation of the episode (see LA Times article), it seems she was fully aware, just angry, nosey and racist.
Betty, she gave a coherent interview to the LA Times and pretty much doubled down on her feelings but apologized for how it came out. While we don’t know her mental health status, it is frustrating that a lot of people run to her defense with all these reasons why she might have acted horribly. The truth is, if the video were reversed and it showed a Latino man acting this way towards a white woman, there would not be defense of this man’s mental health.
My apologies, I had neither watched the video nor read the LA Times article when I thought of this possibility. In no way was I attempting to make excuses for racist behavior. Next time I will wait to comment until I’ve read the full information.
Thank you.
What was the “religious gathering” that was mentioned?
Because it forced awareness of this cowardly act on our community. Racism needs to be intimidated and forced out. We cannot stay “comfortable” with it.
That’s what the activist called the gathering. Religious it was not – intimidating the neighborhood, for sure. I live near this apartment building and witnessed them walk UP Garden to Valerio at 9:30pm still chanting, walking on both sidewalks and the middle of the street. How is intimidating a racist (and the neighborhood) any better than what she did??
LA Times has a good write up: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-18/racist-video-roils-santa-barbara-drawing-hundreds-to-impromptu-protest
SBSURFER – thank you for that link. I think it’s very important for many here to read this, especially the end of the article where they interview people at the protest. It’s easy as a white person to say “Oh, I never see any racism here” or “There was probably a reason she was mad” etc etc…. LISTEN to people who have been the target of it. It’s here. Making excuses for it is just as bad.
Does anyone know of Jeanne Umana has made a public statement since the night she appeared at the SB Police station? Thank you.
Yes, check out the LA Times article.
She’s a racist, paranoid old lady. But at the end of the day all these activists did was bully a little old lady. It says a lot about our supposedly racist society that this is the only racist they can find. Or will they branch out and make up racists where there aren’t any.
ERICL – No, that’s not at all “all they did.” Look at this discussion here, look at the other conversations on other social media sites about this. The activists did far more than rightfully shame a racist woman, they brought the topic of racism to the forefront, if not for just a few days, in our community. Sounds like they also rooted out a bunch of racists here…..
“It says a lot about our supposedly racist society that this is the only racist they can find.” – Who says this is the only racist they ever “found?” That’s ridiculous. You don’t think they’d protest a young man being racist? Have you ever heard/seen the protests against racists? This is your first exposure? Of course not.
“Or will they branch out and make up racists where there aren’t any.” – Well now you’re just flat out making things up.
Hey, maybe stop defending racists and bashing those who are trying to end this cowardly, yet common practice. Just do better, man.
Fight what we don’t agree with via bigotry.
I love it. Perfect slogan for the usual crowd here.
SBSTONER – Really? Who “agrees” with racism, other than racist and you apparently? Bigotry against racists? Cry me a river.
So, the words you typed are basically saying, no, actually literally saying, that 1) you think racism is just something that some people agree with and some disagree with (like an opinion), and; 2) we should accept racists in our community and not be prejudiced toward them (bigoted).
That is what you’re saying. Sadly, I’m pretty sure that’s what you truly believe.