By Aaron Kopperman
With the eviction moratorium ending in June, landlords are gearing up to kick out as many tenants as possible who can’t pay rent, to replace them with those who can. This will accelerate and worsen Santa Barbara’s already terrible and racist gentrification problem. As the comments section of any housing-related social media post will show you, it seems everyone knows there’s a housing problem here in SB,and everyone seems to have a solution. Conservatives want developer de-regulation, implying that the magical Free Market will solve the issue by the Law of Supply and Demand. Liberals want to allow developers to build more housing, implying that if more gets built, inevitably there will be more affordable housing.
According to Mayor Murillo, nearly 60% of those who live in the City of Santa Barbara are renters. A much smaller percentage, even among homeowners, could be considered landlords/developers. Why, then, are both Liberal and Conservative solutions financially beneficial to developers, while the well-being of the majority of Santa Barbara residents is treated as an afterthought?
There are plenty of so-called progressives here in Santa Barbara who rally local politicians to provide temporary band-aids, such as extending the COVID eviction moratorium, and forcing landlords to provide relocation assistance in cases of a no-fault eviction. These are victories, but do nothing to challenge the actual power landlords and developers hold, as made evident by their continued use of loopholes, even during the pandemic. We’ve heard countless stories of landlords “soft-evicting” tenants through inconveniences such as frequent “repairs”, claims of a family member needing to move in, and outright harassment.
We don’t need more city council meetings begging for more band-aids. We need to make housing a human right, a fully de-commodified public good guaranteed to all.
For this to happen, we need a militant tenant movement to flex the power we do have over landlords/developers – people power.
What this means is a massive number of tenants (like you and me!) willing to organize into tenant associations with their neighbors to bargain collectively with landlords. These local tenant associations can collectively use different tactics, including the withholding of rent, to flex some real power against abusive landlords. We at Santa Barbara Tenants Union are here to assist in the formation of tenant associations, and facilitate the bargaining process with direct guidance from tenants.
Historically, the biggest gains have been made not by asking for power, but by seizing it.
There are over 65,000 tenants in Santa Barbara, and if all of us were to unite into a single fighting organization, we could stop every rent hike, every eviction, and every instance of landlord harassment and abuse. We could flex our people power to reduce the landlord lobby influence in local government, and rewrite every law to benefit us as tenants. This is only possible if more tenants join us and get active.
Join the Santa Barbara Tenants Union if you want to become an active member of a fighting organization led and funded exclusively for and by tenants who wish to make housing a human right!
tinyURL.com/joinSBTU / sbtenantsunion@gmail.com
Do you have an opinion on something local? Share it with us at
. The views and opinions expressed in Op-Ed articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of edhat.
The landlords still have to pay their mortgage, insurance and upgrades when needed, and whatever else. How can they afford to keep their rentals, if they can’t charge rent??
And, the landlords still have to support their own family….. Why should they have to support the tenants / squatters too? OK – where do I sign up for FREE housing, or should I just move into a nice house, and stop paying rent??
What is Santa Barbara’s “racist gentrification problem?”
I will refrain from commenting specifically on the OP here. However, I have always felt that there needs to be some form of dissociation from housing being used as a financial tool. A home should be a place for people to live and not an investment or sole source of income. With too many investors, landlords, developers, etc. looking at housing as a purely financial tool there is a strong force to push housing prices up and up. I have always wondered what the nation would look like if rental properties were limited. Maybe allowing people to only own one rental property and prohibit landlords living out of the area. There would still be rental property for people that need it but people and institutions could no longer generate huge profits from owning multiple properties. Local prices would still be driven by supply and demand, but the supply wouldn’t be constrained by investors and landlords. Real estate would be freed up and prices would balance to the point many could afford a home. I agree that housing is a right. I don’t agree with housing being free, unionized, or subsidized by the government, but we should stop looking at our homes as investments and sources of income. For the record, I am a homeowner.
Supply & demand.
And that free housing should all be ocean view!!!!
Hey BOSCO…Allowing people to only own 1 rental property and prohibit landlords from living outside the area? Sounds an awful lot like Big Brother to me.
It’s interesting/scary when people start openly posting about “SEIZING POWER”. I guess Aaron didn’t take many history classes during his time in Isla Vista…then again it’s UCSB so maybe he did…
We live in a highly desirable spot! This is true the world over…
Pop over to Fresno or Bakersfield if your looking for affordability…
This is not a new idea. New York City was a pioneer for rent control and other tenants rights measures following WWII. Here is an interesting New York Times article from 1976 about how that turned out.
https://www.nytimes.com/1976/04/12/archives/housing-abandonment-spreads-in-bronx-and-parts-of-brooklyn-housing.html
Good one Aaron!!! Missed April fools day by a little over a month.
I did read that article! I guess it’s all what you focus on, right? I kind of focused on the quote just above that one that said her three bedroom house is $945 per month. Or earlier in that article where two bedroom apartments in Fresno are $725 per month.
There’s gonna be alot of homeless mother fockers out there starting cooking fires people that don’t even have enough moola to get on a greyhound and get the flock out of this rich mans town…Don’t cry
anymore about how they are ruining your day. You have no right you farted out your heart this morning when you were doing your B.M. while enjoying your latte supreme sitting upon your golden thrones.
There is plenty of affordable housing —
Bakersfield — average home price $160K average rent $1k/month.
If that is too expensive Wichita, Kansas — average home price $60K rent $700/month.
If enough people moved out of Santa Barbara the prices would have to go down. Start a movement — move out.
Human rights are a human construct. Nature could care less about them.
Yes, they are going to kick you out for someone who pays rent. It’s a no brainer. You make enough on unemployment, likely more than you did before Covid so you should be able to pay, if you were able to pay before. There are plenty of jobs out there, businesses are having problems hiring so there are no more excuses. Pay your rent or you don’t get to squat.
And, it’s possible that once the unpaying renters are removed, many more units will open up and rents likely or hopefully will go down.
And PS I am a renter and I think it’s ridiculous at this point considering how many jobs are out there, how much unemployment is paying, that anyone can’t pay rent especially if they paid it before they got the extra $$$ from unemployment.
Renters such as Aaron need to have a shift in perception when it comes to landlords. Rather than viewing them as evil greedy people preying on the poor defenseless tenants, perhaps the should be viewed as benefactors who are the ones who make it possible for tenants to live in Santa Barbara. How many tenants would be able to buy the properties that they live in. How many have the long income history and high credit score that would qualify them for a mortgage. How many have the 20% down payment sitting in the bank. Renters choose to live in Santa Barbara, one of the most expensive real estate markets in the world. No one is forcing you to live here. It is your choice.
you can’t install artificial controls. The market place will eventually figure it out. If you can’t afford to live here, find someplace you can, make a killing and come back if you so choose. There is no entitlement living in SB. Folks in other places enjoy their quality of life, people naturally acclimate to what works best.
5:30 – Good to know you’re in favor of things like cannibalism, murder, and incest.
When I wanted a Bentley but couldn’t afford it. They pointed towards the Toyota dealer.
For a lot of jobs… not that much different!!!
1 way bus ticket to Waco texas
Fact is many landlords are greedy and buy multiple properties, then fail to maintain their bounty, or do the bare minimum. They collect large damage deposits which they are loathe to return. They can collect interest on this largesse. Tenants cannot. Fairness and decency ate sorely lacking….if you have an honorable , local owner….count your blessing. A tenant who pays their rent regularly and honors the rules of the lease should be treated with respect, and repairs & maintenance not deferred
Again, if you’re are lucky ,& in a rarefied situation, please refrain from nasty comments about moving to Fresno . Greed is what allows Santa Barbara from being a real community. The wealthy rule and are happily being snarky & judgmental . Making those who lack a hefty cash flow feel even worse is unkind and results in a very splintered NONcommunity. Next time your auto needs a repair, thank the mechanic who probably drives here from Lompoc….or the clerk at the grocery store who surely struggles to pay rent in SB….and so on. What if they all move to Fresno? Who will do your hair, cook your restaurant food, provide for your clean streets, patrol those same streets and so on. We rely on one another, and WE must recognize & honor all denizens instead of insulting the ones who are not Uber wealthy. If there’s a huge natural disaster, many of the functional (not an oxymoron) homeless will have the survival skills & knowledge you will need. The tourists won’t . So, be respectful and try some kindness. The Norwegians (in the top five again for happiness and health) have a word that guides their successful country and it means “no one is beneath me or above me.”. That is wise, and true…but not acknowledged here. A tenant organization, therefore, is a necessity.
RENT CONTROL is needed! The prices of rentals – most of which are 40+ years old – are astronomical.
Ummm. In case the poster of this Op Ed hasn’t noticed, there is a limited amount of land for housing when you have the Los Padres forest/ Mountains on one side and the Pacific on the other… The Santa Barbara Housing Authority has used it’s political clout and bully tactics to take over apartments and create high density and low income, State parolee and drug/alcohol housing all over the City. In fact, more than 20% of all housing in Santa Barbara is taxpayer subsidized… Should it be 50%?, 75%…? I would actually love to live in Pacific Palisades or Malibu- Should I DEMAND my human right to housing there….? Don’t be ridiculous. Many, including myself, rented outside of SB for years, then bought a fixer-upper outside of SB (2x) before being able to buy IN SB- It’s called personal responsibility- Try it in your life rather than demanding entitlements.
What does “housing is a human right” actually mean? Everyone should be given a free place to stay if they can’t or don’t want to pay for one?
Citizensb, Shanghai as a model to aspire to? Really? Nice place. Only took 100 million deaths to get it to where it’s at today.
Most of you enjoy having service workers aka slaves pampering you then going back to Bakersfield at the end of their shifts some of us choose to stay retire or become disabled.. Just like everyone else what you want and what you get are 2 different things this is a FREE COUNTRY If you don’t like it move to Russia.
Ironically the Op-Ed poster moved from low rent Bakersfield to live in high rent Santa Barbara. His Facebook page encourages defunding the police, banning guns, eliminating all student debt, and declaring racism a public health emergency.
Wow. I can’t imagine a worse tenant than the OP. Demands a free place to live in the town in which he wants to live in? I guess that things could be worse, you could be married to him…
Aware – the problem is you aren’t factoring in (or considering) that Santa Barbara is a wildly desirable place to live… more so than Fresno or Bakersfield. Beautiful/desirable places cost more. It’s pretty straight forward. When I lived in London I would have loved to be in zone 1… Finances though dictated zone 4 and an hour plus travel time. Using your Norway example, rents in Oslo are dramatically higher than Trondheim. It’s life. Most people get to choose, there are tons of jobs available right now in places that are dramatically cheaper than Santa Barbara. But if you choose to live in Santa Barbara (as presumably we all do), it does come with correlating higher living expense. Such is the rub of enjoying (and living in) the American Riviera. I could move to Fresno or Phoenix and have a house that was twice the size and half the cost (with a pool and a new car to boot)… like a couple of friends I know… who are happy! But… they don’t have campus point or east beach. Keep your boat and quad…I’ll take our coast (and the correlating cost) over those toys (experienced in 112 degrees of course). There are much cheaper options 60 minutes away from places Like la Jolla or Presidio heights or zone 1 or the 16th arrondissement… one must choose what they want and value.
Well… If you are going to demand/seize free education and housing… definitely makes more sense to demand it of UCSB and Santa Barbara than Cal State Bakersfield….
My aunt is in her 80. Lives in her garage and a side room and rents out her home to survive. Her property taxes, mortgage and insurance are very high. Her gardners now want $25 an hour to keep up her property which is not fancy or big. Not to mention the city raises water rates often. Her renters have not paid her rent for months. One is on unemployment the other working from home so still being paid so yes they are getting 2 checks they seem to go camping and traveling yet she can’t get them to pay rent due to the eviction moratorium. Why should my aunt risk loosing her home she has worked long and hard to keep. There are many sides to these stories not all Santa Barbara landlords are rich.
This is a message for all did people not notice OP comments For this to happen, we need a militant tenant movement to flex the power we do have over landlords/developers – people power. Historically, the biggest gains have been made not by asking for power, but by seizing It. The militant groups in Seattle going through streets demanding people to get out of their homes and give them to those who need them is not something wonderful Santa Barbara need to encourage.
I was looking to buy a cheaper place outside of Las Vegas. I found a whole neighborhood of empty newer nice places when I asked a realtor about them she told me the have all been nought by Chinese investors and left empty.
@AWARE- Not sure if you are “aware”, but auto mechanics and other skilled trades make a livable and significant wages… It’s the recent “graduates” from UCSB whose parents paid for their “education college experience” and now that they are in the REAL WORLD, expect entitlements like high paying jobs, a new car, wardrobe, and afford rent in the area they WANT to stay in….base simply on a piece of paper that states a B.A. or Master Degree… It appears as if the OP is of a similar background, he has been taught that entitlements are part of life. What I don’t get is that he is a white kid and state that the S.B. housing situation is “racist”… I guess that taught that in College too.
Progressive = progress towards destroying liberty.
Pitmix – I can’t believe I’m saying this, but…YES…I agree with you… overpopulation is the long term problem facing us all.
As for housing, again…free market capitalism does work, and is working…it’s just not working the way a 20 year old from Bakersfield wants it to be working. It’s silly to think you can simply move to a highly desirably (and as such expensive spot) and expect to pay the same rent as the wildly less desirable place you are coming from. It’s not only wildly silly and narcissitic…it’s downright ridiculous. There is a finite amount of housing in SB…
And again, as per the OP “seize power to make housing a human right, a fully de-commodified public good guaranteed to all.” So you are right…not asking for free stuff…DEMANDING IT!!
Pitmix – Government is helping…it’s just local state government (and just not ours). If you are a big company it makes no sense to set up shop in California at this point. Head to Florida or Texas or Tennessee or Colorado.
Should I demand that the LARK charge the same prices as KFC? Should Audi cost the same as a KIA? It’s a choice…Aaron can get a job in Bakersfield where he is probably buying a house in 3-5 years. This isn’t a shock that Santa Barbara is expensive…the shock is people demanding the very best be subsidized for them.
I’m sorry, Aaron… what? I cannot find the point in this meandering piece. To create a tenant’s association to make housing a human right for all? That’s how it reads, but it makes no sense. You need an editor before attempting any more chest-pounding. You also need to study local rental laws, the VAST majority of which are already in favor of tenants. I’ve been a renter in SBC for over twenty years; while there is plenty that I don’t agree with when it comes to certain landlords or property managers, I have had really great and reasonable landlords. *Also, housing will NEVER be a basic human right. Tenancy is a voluntary contract we enter into, wherein we agree to pay a fee in exchange for a place to live. Why on earth would someone agree to be a tenant at a property with known issues, or that they cannot afford, or with a landlord who is shady? Do your research BEFORE you rent. And if you cannot find suitable housing in Santa Barbara, do like me and move a little bit outside of SB where it is more reasonable. The world owes you nothing. You will learn this as you mature.
“If government wanted to help, they would encourage businesses to set up in places that have housing with tax breaks and such.” Pit, that is a good idea and sounds very similar to Opportunity Zones.
Repeat: the world owes you nothing.
As just like that, poof, Pit no longer likes his own idea because it’s associated with something the Orange Man did…
Can’t you figure a way to attack Aaron without resorting to lies? I didn’t see any demand for a free place in the op-ed.
Pit – well, the quote is:
We need to make housing a human right, a fully de-commodified public good guaranteed to all.
How do you read that? I read that as a guy who chose a stunning spot to go to school and now wants to be subsidised to stay here forever…
“Seizing power… for a public good guaranteed to all”…
Kind of sounds like, free housing… no?
Living in Santa Barbara is a privilege. Housing is a commodity. Neither is a right.