Oil Company Ordered to Pay $65 Million for Central Coast Oil Spills

By the U.S. Department of Justice

On March 2, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entered final judgment against HVI Cat Canyon Inc., formerly known as Greka Oil & Gas Inc., in a civil suit brought jointly by the United States, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Coast Guard, and by the State of California on behalf of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region. 

The United States and California filed the suit alleging that HVI Cat Canyon, which previously owned and operated multiple oil and gas production facilities in Santa Barbara County, California, was liable for:

  • 12 oil spills into waters of the United States in violation of the Clean Water Act;
  • 17 oil spills into waters of the state in violation of state law;
  • Reimbursement of the federal and state governments’ costs of cleaning up the oil spills;
  • Natural resource damages under state law for harm to fish, plant, bird, or animal life and habitat; and
  • Numerous violations of federal Oil Pollution Prevention Regulations identified in 16 EPA inspections across 11 facilities.

The court’s judgment follows an earlier 65-page opinion dated Feb. 25, in which the court awarded the United States and California the full amount of civil penalties, response costs, and damages that they sought at trial.  

“We applaud the court’s decision to hold HVI Cat Canyon responsible for the full extent of the harm they caused,” said Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the Justice Department’s Environmental and Natural Resources Division. “This outcome is a prime example of strong federal and state partnership and persistence in pursuing justice against a company that long flouted its compliance obligations.”

“This final judgment reflects EPA’s continued commitment to ensuring companies that operate oil and gas production facilities comply with federal clean water laws and prevent unnecessary oil spills,” said Regional Administrator Martha Guzman of EPA Pacific Southwest. “Holding companies responsible for failing to meet their environmental obligations is key to protecting our waterways and surrounding communities.”

“The California Department of Fish and Wildlife is committed to protecting our state’s pristine natural resources,” said CDFW Director Charlton H. Bonham. “Staff from our Office of Spill Prevention and Response work daily to prevent, prepare for and respond to oil spill incidents statewide. The collective efforts of state and federal regulators to hold this company accountable for the significant impacts they have caused is evidence of our dedication to fighting every day for the resources we hold in trust for all Californians.”

“HVI Cat Canyon, formerly GREKA, is being held accountable in their long history of multiple violations and on-going non-compliance across many agencies,” said Regional Water Board Chair Jane Gray. “This judgment is a testament to the multi-year efforts of agencies and the legal system’s ability to provide justice for egregious actions perpetrated against the environment.”

The court found that the 12 spills into waters of the United States, which occurred from 2005 through 2010, resulted from HVI Cat Canyon’s gross negligence. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, the spills evinced a pattern of reckless disregard for good oilfield industry practices, and a series of negligent acts or omissions by HVI concerning oil spill prevention, and pipeline and facility inspection and maintenance,” the court wrote. In total, the court found that the spills had discharged approximately 26,584 barrels of crude oil and produced water, a briny waste by-product of oil production. The court also ruled that HVI Cat Canyon had committed a total of 60 violations of the federal regulations at 11 facilities for a total of 86,842 days of violation.

Ultimately the court held HVI Cat Canyon liable to the United States for $40 million in civil penalties for the spills, $15 million in civil penalties for the violations of federal regulations, and $2.5 million in cleanup costs.  The court also held HVI Cat Canyon liable to California for $7.7 million in civil penalties and nearly $200,000 in natural resource damages and cleanup costs.

The case is styled United States, et al. v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., formerly known as Greka Oil & Gas Inc., No. 2:11-cv-05097-FMO-SS (C.D. Cal.). The court’s order is available through the court’s website, www.cacd.uscourts.gov.

Avatar

Written by Anonymous

What do you think?

Comments

3 Comments deleted by Administrator

Leave a Review or Comment

86 Comments

  1. Greka is a fine example of fossil fuel industry irresponsibility and determination to pollute at will. Burning fossil fuels pollute land, air and water, and are proven heat source disruptors of the earth’s climate. The “mining” of fossil fuel is notoriously destructive and polluting. Alternatives – solar , wind, geothermal heating/cooling , magnetic propulsion, hydrogen, and other “clean” power technologies are far cleaner and less damaging overall (and in the long run much cheaper) than the development and burning of fossil fuels. Some of the biggest hinderances to adopting clean energy is inertia (difficult to change from one source to another), extremely well paid jobs in the industry (which creates an understandable concern for job loss) and the enormous power of the fossil fuel industry.

  2. Recycling we ship overseas isn’t that “green” either.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSL6HuqM0Yc
    Here is the current problem facing recycling old solar panels
    “There’s a cost problem in the US because it’s way more expensive to recycle than it is to dump. It costs less than $1 to dump a panel in a landfill and between $12-25 to recycle it, but only $3 is paid out for recovered aluminum, copper, and glass”.

  3. Chip isn’t that far off saying oil and gas are cleaner than wind and solar. Granted the wind is clean, the solar energy is clean, but what is not clean is all the stuff mined, extracted, smelted, manufactured, recycled, most of it overseas in Asia.
    Here is a current map of Asian air pollution, then go to the pollution map of North America at the same link. Then deny we are outsourcing pollution.
    https://aqicn.org/map/asia/
    We use a ton of fossil fuels in the USA but somehow how pollution in North America is lower than the places USA imports everything from. Explain?

Stabbing on State Street During Altercation

Courthouse Construction in 1926