To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
It better be fixed in the next 24 hours, or else, with the heat wave coming, this could be a disaster for residents on the Westside. Also, the most recent weather forecast warns of possible power outages. Red Cross, can you open shelters, with back-up generators? SBCC? Showers there?
There was a water main break this past week in San Fernando Valley, and it took 1 week for the people to get their water back again. Hope that it’s done today in Westside.
How much more are you willing to pay on your water bill so that they can do this work? Or do you think that the money for these projects grows on trees? I’m not a big fan of Public Works and their cost overruns on the desal plant project but I don’t see how this is their fault.
Priorities need to be set. The $80M (and growing ) cost and increasing operating expense of the desalination plant was given priority. A small portion of that money would probably increase the replacement to at list 5% a year and could save a lot more water than the equal amount given to the desalination boondoggle.