Anonymous
By Harrison Tasoff, UC Santa Barbara
The Pacific Ocean covers 32% of Earth’s surface area, more than all the land combined. Unsurprisingly, its activity affects conditions around the globe.
Periodic variations in the ocean’s water temperature and winds, called the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, are a major meteorologic force. Scientists know that human activity is affecting this system, but are still determining the extent. A new study in Nature has revealed that the atmospheric component — called the “Pacific Walker Circulation” — has changed its behavior over the industrial era in ways that weren’t expected. The international team of authors also found that volcanic eruptions can cause the Walker Circulation to temporarily weaken, inducing El Niño conditions. The results provide important insights into how El Niño and La Niña events may change in the future.
“The question is, ‘How does the background circulation change?” said co-author Samantha Stevenson, an associate professor at UC Santa Barbara’s Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. “We care about the Walker Circulation because it affects weather around the world.”
The Walker Circulation drives air currents in the Pacific, which then affect weather conditions across the globe. [Photo Credit: Fiona Martin]
Earth’s rotation causes warm surface water to pool on the western side of ocean basins. In the Pacific, this induces more humid conditions in Asia, with low-altitude trade winds blowing west across the sea. The high-altitude easterlies create an atmospheric circulation — the Walker Circulation — that drives weather patterns in the tropical Pacific, and far beyond.
“The tropical Pacific has an outsized influence on global climate,” said Sloan Coats, study co-author and assistant professor of earth sciences in the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology. “Understanding how it responds to volcanic eruptions, anthropogenic aerosols and greenhouse gas emissions is fundamental to confidently predicting climate variability.”
These effects leave biologic and geologic signatures. The team used data from ice cores, trees, lakes, corals and caves to investigate the long-term weather patterns of the Pacific over the past 800 years.
“They aren’t thermometers, but they contain information about the climate,” Stevenson said.
Certain conditions favor uptake of heavier or lighter versions of an element, called an isotope, into structures like carbonate skeletons, sediment and tree rings. The researchers used sophisticated statistics to analyze the ratios of different types of oxygen and hydrogen. This allowed them to track how the Walker Circulation changed in the past and compare trends from before and after the rise in greenhouse gases.
“We set out to determine whether greenhouse gases had affected the Pacific Walker Circulation,” said lead author Georgy Falster, a research fellow at the Australian National University and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes. “We found that the overall strength hasn’t changed yet, but instead, the year-to-year behavior is different.” Falster started this research as a postdoctoral research associate at Washington University in St. Louis.
They observed that the length of time for the Walker Circulation to switch between El Niño-like and La Niña-like phases has slowed slightly over the industrial era. “That means in the future we could see more of these multi-year La Niña or El Niño events as the atmospheric flow above the Pacific Ocean switches more slowly between the two phases,” Falster said. That could exacerbate the associated risks of drought, fire, rains and floods.
That said, the authors didn’t notice any significant change in the circulation’s strength — yet. “That was one surprising result,” Stevenson said, “Because by the end of the 21st century, most climate models suggest that the Walker Circulation will weaken.”
They also found that volcanic eruptions impacted the circulation. “Following a volcanic eruption, we see a very consistent weakening of the Pacific Walker Circulation,” said co-author Bronwen Konecky, an assistant professor at Washington University in St. Louis. This causes El Niño-like conditions following eruptions.
“Our study provides long-term context for a fundamental component of the atmosphere-ocean system in the tropics,” said Coats, whose expertise covers climate variability over the last 2,000 years. “Understanding how the Pacific Walker Circulation is affected by climate change will enable communities across the Pacific and beyond to better prepare for the challenges they may face in the coming decades.”
Understanding the effect of climate change on the Walker Circulation is also important for creating reliable predictions. “If we don’t know what happened in the real world, then we don’t know if the models that we’re using to project future changes, […] impacts and risks are giving us the right picture,” Stevenson explained.
The researchers are currently looking into what might be causing the changes they witnessed in the Walker Circulation. One of Stevenson’s doctoral students is working on a model of the system that includes the ratios of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. Developing a model that predicts these measurements will provide the researchers with a tool to test different hypotheses.
Marcie Grabowski at University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa contributed to this release.
Unless you have lived here 62 years like myself, I guess it seems “new” to you.
Nothing new except all “The Chicken Littles” with no experience here at all.
I chuckle at releases like this.
More comments from horribly anti-intellectual anti-science dishonest functionally illiterate know-nothings.
AlexBlue (and others): We each have it in our power to do good and I choose to do good. You might benefit from one of my life-coach sessions, especially the one I present to those who are unable to see both sides of the coin: “Tearing Down Walls That Tear Us Apart.” Many people are addicted to their computers and online relationships, but have difficulty dealing with people face-to-face. Sad, but true. Attempts to belittle, besmirch, and yes, Tear Down are not good for the heart and soul. I would never e-x-p-e-c-t someone to agree with me, but if a person does disagree, that’s fine….but be polite. I have no need for you to respond to me or to apologize, but just know that positivity ALWAYS beats out negativity. In the end, we are all the same people just trying to get along. So, let’s get along for goodness sake.
Please keep in mind that not everyone is going to agree with everything, especially something as controversial as the whole global warming, global cooling, climate change, or whatever those who live off government grants are calling it these days. Not sure how it helps when someone believes to their core that those who don’t think the same way are…..
– horribly anti-intellectual….I disagree with this assessment
– anti-science…I disagree with this assessment
– dishonest…I disagree with this assessment
– functionally illiterate…I disagree with this assessment
– know-nothings…I disagree with this assessment
I think it’s much better to try and understand each other, and not make childish attempts at mockery. That does not work….like it really does not work. Try to understand and we’ll all get along just fine. If we think of ourselves as open minded, then we need to BE open minded. If we think of ourselves as accepting, then we need to BE accepting. If we think of ourselves as giving/forgiving, then we need to BE giving/forgiving.
Life is short. Please don’t spend any of your time tearing down other people. It simply isn’t worth it. (I’ve been guilty of doing this, so please forgive me…thank you!)
Lol
Nothing new here folks except the kids need some grant funding. Can we put some objectivity back into science?
LEW – those “kids” with the insane IQs and abilities are the ones that are trying to save our planet from what you folks did and want to keep doing to it. You can thank them when they’re done, if you’re still around.
This is nothing but a study by folks who get funding to study things that they say they need more money to study. Further studies will indicate that more studies need to be conducted and will require more free grant money. It’s incredible that this endless loop of money-study-money-study-money-More studies-MORE Money-money-money is not obvious to some people. What a scam. Like bringing your car in for a free alignment check and “you need an alignment”…..get your car aligned….drive it for a day….bring it into another place for a free alignment check…..”you need an alignment.” Folks….it’s a scam and we are being scammed plain and simple. One thing that many scams use as the basis for the scam is…..fear. If you don’t do this, then bad things happen unless you give us money to study, and study, and study. Sheep.
“Sheep.” Coming from the guy saying the same thing every Con says about every study every time. You need new material, baaahhhh
If was a PHD and petitioned NOAA to conduct a study on how increased CO2 benefits the natural environment would I get any funding? NO. What about a study that the shows how increased CO2 harms the environment? YES. Do you see how The Science™ works?
HAHAH, VOR.
You literally don’t understand how science works. If you look for grant funding to see how it IMPACTS the environment then you would and if your study found that there were unanticipated “benefits” for human health and stability then that would be your result.
If you look for money to try and find some cherry picked data to prove a pre-conception or support a political agenda, then not so much.