Edhat Staff
View of the Thomas Fire in 2017 (Photo: Mike Eliason / SBCFD)
By edhat staff
Southern California Edison (SCE) has settled claims with 23 public entities from the 2017 Thomas Fire and 2018 Montecito Debris Flow for $360 million.
The settlement also includes impacts from the 2017 Koenigstein Fire and 2018 Woolsey Fire.
“Under the settlements, payments totaling $360 million will be made to the 23 public entities for damages alleged to have been caused by the fires and debris flows, with $150 million allocated to the 2017 fire and 2018 debris flow events and the remaining $210 million allocated to the 2018 Woolsey Fire. The agreements are a compromise reached by SCE and the public entities to resolve the public entities’ claims, and no admission of wrongdoing or liability was made in reaching these agreements,” according to a press release by SCE.
The settlements apply to damages claimed by the public entities only and do not affect the claims of individuals or businesses.
The public entities included for the Thomas Fire, Koenigstein Fire, and Montecito Debris Flow include: City of Santa Barbara, Montecito Water District, County of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District, Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, City of Buenaventura, Carpinteria-Summerland Fire Protection District, Montecito Fire Protection District, County of Ventura, Ventura County Watershed Protection District and the Ventura County Fire Protection District.
The City of Santa Barbara announced it’s receiving a $6,771,882 million settlement as well as $23,918,529 set aside for FEMA/OES reimbursement of pending City claims. The settlement covers lost property, lost revenues, unplanned expenditures, and lost community assets such as environmental and recreational resources, and government infrastructure.
The Montecito Water District announces it will receive approximately $8 million to help complete repairs of critical infrastructure damaged during the fire and debris flow.
“The Water District suffered significant infrastructure damages including the loss of water supply and storage capacity at Jameson Lake as a result of the 2017 Thomas Fire and the 2018 Montecito Debris Flow,” said Montecito Water District Board President Floyd Wicks.
The County of Ventura has agreed to a $20.8 million settlement and stated after costs and attorney’s fees, the County will receive a net total of $16.7 million.
“We look forward to engaging with other parties who have a similar interest in good faith settlement efforts. We also will continue to make substantial investments in our system and enhance our operational practices to reduce the risk of wildfires in our service area and safely provide power to homes and businesses,” said Pedro J. Pizarro, president and CEO of Edison International, the parent company of SCE.
SCE states it has taken steps to reduce the risk of fires caused by its electrical equipment in high-risk fire areas. The company has proposed spending $582 million on its Grid Safety and Resiliency Program (GSRP) which includes installing insulated wire to reduce the risk of sparks. SCE has installed the first 300 miles of insulated wire, with plans to replace nearly 1,000 miles by the end of 2020 and to install about 4,900 additional miles between 2021 and 2023.
Other steps to prevent fires started by electrical fires include the controversial Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) where power grids are shut down during potentially dangerous weather conditions in fire-prone areas.
In their press release, SCE points out “many factors contribute to rising wildfire risk” including dry vegetation, drought, hazardous fuels, increasing temperatures, lower humidity, and strong Santa Ana winds.
SCE has yet to settle claims and lawsuits with individuals and businesses.
and how much of that goes back to the citizens of the city county etc…. NONE!
Oops – why do you feel entitled to a single penny? If you’re home/property was destroyed then you file a separate claim/lawsuit. If not, you’re owed nothing.
Alot of people ended up with severe respiratory illnesses from the Thomas fire not all of us sued. They got off easy.
Roger – true! Many were impacted, but this suit was only related to claims from public entities, not individuals like us.
Perhaps SCE ignited the fire, but I feel like the outcome was inevitable with our without their contribution. We know the mountains above Santa Barbara and Montecito will burn. We could clear fire breaks, build more access roads, conduct controlled burns, etc. to mitigate this danger. We choose not to do that. We know the watersheds in the mountains above Santa Barbara and Montecito cause flooding and debris flows. We could build debris basins to protect our communities (Carpinteria did, and was spared from flooding). We choose not to do that. If we continue to choose not to address these issues, Montecito and the city of Santa Barbara will experience catastrophic debris flows in the future regardless of what ignites the fire that precedes them.
We should all sue the County of Santa Barbara for dumping the toxic sludge from the mudslide on to Goleta Beach and calling it “beach nourishment”.
Our taxes are what pay for the expenses to fire departments, water districts, etc. incurred from the fires and debris flows. So, yes, SEC is responsible for some help for the cost, ultimately helping us as tax payers. Why would these public outfits owe any money to private citizens? NONE is correct. Most can sue and collect from their insurance. No amount of money is going to make everything perfect again.
If Alice hurts Bob and Carol and Bob wins a lawsuit against Alice, how much of the reward goes to Carol … NONE! Which, um, makes sense … Carol can still sue Bob. In this case, though, in addition to individuals being able to file their own lawsuits against SCE, ALL of the reward that goes to the city, county, etc. goes to their citizens, because they are the source of the revenue for those entities and the recipients of their services–Civics 101.
“Carol can still sue Bob” — or rather, Carol can still sue Alice.
Here’s a reality check for you Flicka- There is a portion of every bill that PG&E and SCE customers pay (at least over the last 30 yrs) is supposed to go to upgrading their INFRASTRUCTURE… Did that happen…??? NO, Did the Executives and Upper Management continue to recieve 100’s of Millions of dollars EACH year …? YES. Do the linemen and women continue to make $300K plus in salaries and OT maintaining circa 1800’s powerlines across the country….? YES . Meanwhile Billion$ of dollars in private and public property have been destroyed, lives lost … and the money continues to flow to the above mentioned….
The inverse condemnation law is foolish and unfair. It decrees that utilities are strictly liable- that means even if they weren’t negligent. Think about that. The flood was an act of god. A tremendous flow of rain and a repeat of what happened in the 1960’s. And you’ve got the climate hysterics saying these fires and floods are caused by global warming. If so, why hold utilities to an impossible standard? Beyond that- and here’s the rub- we, the ratepayers will pick up the bill through increased fees. If we don’t, the utility goes out of business and for those who think the government can do a better job, please get treated at a VA hospital next time.
We’re picking up the fee no matter what. Only way to avoid it would be to build a solar system with a battery so you can disconnect from the grid. Just wait for the power companies to ask for a lot more money to harden their grid.
Facts are relentless things. Deniers prefer to stick their heads in the sand and mumble about their baseless fantasies.
Settled for pension money! And lawyers stick their grubby little paws in the comb for $34M of honey. Homeowners will wait. Bills will go up. Infrastructure will dwindle.
The “hysteric” is the climate science denier.
“Denier” is a religious term, not a scientific term. Science is open to debate and encourages new and differing ideas. Science is not righteous, and instead acknowledges its limitations and uncertainties. Also, science allows one individual to be proven correct against a “consensus” of many (like Galileo). In religion, debate is not allowed and the truth is determined by the “consensus” of the majority. Claiming that human caused global warming is truth because a lot of people believe in it is religion, not science. Religious zealots persecute those who do not toe the line, calling them deniers for example. A scientist would dispassionately assess competing theories, identify their strengths and limitations, and devise experiments to evaluate them. Suppression of dissenting viewpoints is not compatible with science.
Typical dishonest denier talking points. “Claiming that human caused global warming is truth because a lot of people believe in it is religion, not science.” — This strawman gives away how extraordinarily dishonest you are. You know nothing of climate science and deny all presented facts.
It is denial that is religious, rooted in ideology, not facts. But denial doesn’t cancel the scientific facts of reality: https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/14/europe/veneto-council-climate-change-floods-trnd-intl-scli/index.html The science is out there to be had for people who aren’t fundamentally dishonest; even you know where to look, fake-skeptic. I won’t waste more of my time.
A “consensus” has been established…We are righteous…Our truth is absolute…Denial is sin…Deniers shall be punished…The end is nigh…Repent now before it is too late…You must obey and conform…etc.